LIKE WHAT YOU SEE? CONSIDER PURCHASING A MAN CAN:
SIGN UP FOR OUR EMAIL LIST:
SUPPORT IV8888 ON PATREON:
In this video we take a look at a very budget minded optic, the Primary Arms 1-6X24mm in a 7.62×39/300 BLK ACSS reticle pattern and see if it tracks out to 600 yards with Wolf 123gr ammunition. After the filming of the video, we were informed that the reticle was graduated using Golden Tiger ammunition which is supposedly a little hotter than the Wolf we were using which was going transonic at 525-500 yards and destabilizing. Rest assured that we will revisit this concept in the future. Stay tuned, much more on the way
CHECK OUT OUR WEBSITE!
CUSTOM IV8888 PATCHES:
Shirts & other accessories:
AR500 STEEL TARGETS:
FULL30:
Like us on Facebook:
Follow us on Instagram:
Follow us on Twitter:
Disclaimer: Our videos are for entertainment purposes only, imitation or the use of any instruction shown in the videos is solely AT YOUR OWN RISK. Iraqveteran8888 will not be held liable for any injury to yourself or damage to your firearms resulting from attempting anything shown in any our videos.
Copyright 2018, 88 Industries, LLC
Related posts:
Leupold Mark 6 3-18x44mm Overview & Long Range Shooting
IV8888 Man Can January 2018 Unboxing
Swedish AG-42B at 600 yards
Egyptian FN-49 8x57mm
Beretta ARX-100
Argentine 1909 Cavalry Carbine
Kriss Vector 45 ACP Factory SBR
Ruger American .450 Bushmaster
New for 2018: Nikon Monarch 3000 STABILIZED Rangefinder
Gewehr 98s at 600 yards
Gun Gripes #146: “Upcoming ATF Rulemaking Deadline”
Firearms Facts: Is .40 Caliber Dead?
Top 5 Ways to Hide Guns From Your Wife
How to Mount an Optic Like a Pro
Trijicon ACOG: The Best Battle Rifle Optic?
Love my primary arms 1-6! Mine is the 5.56 reticle though. Thanks for the video guys!
Perfect scope for northeast whitetail hunting where shots are rarely longer than 100 yards!
LMAO, regardless of what you claim in this review, everyone and their mother knows PA 1-6x optics are gtg. I can only guess that you intentionally used garbage ammo for the accuracy test as to produce “unacceptable” results.
Being at least 2 years late to the party you had to attempt to throw some controversy into the mix in order to get more views? Or was the problem that PA didn’t pay for the review unlike so many other manufacturers out there? Because we all know about the pamphlet.
Are you guys haters of primary arms, what gives. Let’s not test a ss Camaro on the cheapest tires we could buy!
Obrij se brate
Can you guys do an ar 10 build I’ve been wanting to see on a good one from a well known crew such as yourselves
This scope or any other will not improve a bullets BC. The 1-6 and 1-8 are great scopes from PA